CAAR is one of several industry groups forming a unified coalition to respond to the PMRA’s proposed decisions on Clothianidin and Thiamethoxam that were announced August 15.
Common Messaging: Clolthinianidin and Thiamethoxam August 15 Proposed Decisions
Human health and the environment are priorities.
- Growers ensure approved crop protection products are used in ways that are safe for human health and the environment.
- When changes to approved uses are being considered, the human health and environmental impacts of alternatives need to be part of that analysis.
PMRA’s work is critical to trade and growers’ competitiveness.
- Canada has set a goal of hitting $75 billion worth of agricultural exports by 2025.
- PMRA is the only agency in Canada with the specialized expertise to help support and defend Canada’s interests with our trading partners. The PMRA needs the mandate to do this.
These proposed decisions add to the evidence that the process is flawed and urgently needs fixing.
- Public consultations on the proposed risk assessment need to be decoupled from the proposed risk mitigation measures.
- In the August 15 decisions, PMRA itself questions the quality and statistical significance of the data it used in its risk assessment – had stakeholders been consulted, we could have helped refine the evaluation to inform decisions on appropriate uses.
The proposed decisions on neonics contain no plausible evidence of benefits for either human health or the environment and risk making growers less competitive.
- We need a re-evaluation policy environment that is predictable - proposed decisions like these send unfounded shocks into the market place and negative signals to investors.
- The Canadian and United States markets are highly integrated, similar pest control products should be available in each country allowing Canadian growers to remain competitive.
Maintaining public trust is essential.
- Given the current process does not allow stakeholders to comment on the draft risk assessment first, major differences are expected between proposed decisions and final decisions which creates unfounded perceptions of "big agriculture influence."
- Changes result from the science that wasn’t considered in the draft risk assessment until after the proposed decision was published.
Solutions have been identified and can be made under PMRA’s existing authorities.
- Discussion prior to starting the evaluations could identify risk of concern and allow stakeholders the time needed to address these and to generate data, if required.
- If additional risks are identified once the evaluation has begun, there should also be an opportunity for dialogue to address these.
- Right now, the proposed decisions are often based on incomplete risk assessments.
PMRA’S backlog can be addressed.
- Actively collaborating with international partners (i.e., U.S. EPA) to the share workload.
- Exploring the use of emerging scientific analysis tools (e.g., Risk21 approach).
- Commissioning a third-party review of the current post-market review processes to identify further opportunities for streamlining.
- Compliance Reminder: B620 Changes in Effect CAAR is reminding all members that they must adhere to the updated B620-14 Standard to remain in compliance with Transportation of Dangerous Goods Regulations. Under the new standard, visual inspections for all anhyd...
- CAAR Among Industry Groups Concerned about PMRA’s Proposed Decision on Neonics On Aug. 15, the Pest Management Regulatory Agency (PMRA) released proposed decisions to phase out all outdoor use of clothianidin and thiamethoxam, two important products that have been used responsibly by Canadian c...
- CAN End-User Brochure and eLearning Course Now Available Fertilizer Canada released the new Calcium Ammonium Nitrate Security Code of Practice (CAN Security Code) this year for implementation in 2019. The CAN Security Code aims to provide uniform security practices for the...
- CAAR’s Temporary Certificate TH 0653.1 Has Expired CAAR would like to remind all members that Temporary Certificate TH 0653.1 is no longer valid as of June 30. The certificate granted relief from three-year hydrostatic tank testing, as required by the CSA B620/B622-1...
- Member Alert: Anhydrous Ammonia Incident Prompts Compliance Requirement Reminder CAAR is reminding members to ensure that they are up-to-date on all regulatory requirements related to anhydrous ammonia following a recent incident in Manitoba. CAAR thanks the member company involved in the inci...